rd table.
image
 
image
 

Welcome to the Stucture of Reality Website

The author of the works on this website is Gary T Forbat

Before proceeding to the main theory, please read the introduction to it here below:

An introduction to the Structure of Reality theory 7th March 2014

Here is my current version of the introduction to the Theory (last updated 18nd June 2015 -only PART 1 so far)

PART 1

Based on theapplication of intuitive logic on measurements, instrumental observations, and on what we as humans experience, the spatial universe appears to be extending indefinitely away from us in all directions. But there comes a stage when it is too far to observe, yet there is nothing to suggest that at any further distance anything different occured to what we can already observe at shorter distances. In this way he observed spatial environment clearly suggests a three dimensionally structured space existing contimually through time, making four dimensions. How to give it some measurable identity. Immediately a three dimensional Cartesian geometry comes to mind. It would represent perfectly physical structure of the 3d space, and clearly it leads to infinite extension. The spatial environment can be thought of as an infinitely extended pure emptiness inside which matter and forces exist. While3D Cartesian geometry perfectly represents the 3D structure of infinite spacen, this combined with the infinity of the time dimension explains its continued existence infinitely in the future, since nothing suggests a change to the status quo. Another way of looking at time as hosting a never ending present. It is an aspect of time we are not used to seeing, but it is actually the absolute value underlaying the idea of passage of time, since passage is determined by matter activity within a 4 dimensional spatial environment providing a never ending present.

The four dimensions of the spatial environment may form the primary aspect of physical reality, but there is clearly much more to it. Inside the infinite emptiness of space exists matter and forces. Forces create the interaction between matter parts, but then, do not forces emanate from matter itself ? Clearly then forces can be seen as a function of matter, and there is interchangeability. While matter in all its aspects conforms to three/four dimensionality, but in other aspects there are great differences between space and matter. It is as though they are opposites. The pure emptiness of space is an unity, a is a single unbroken, at any scale level, unified continuum. Tangible matter, on the other hand is always fragmented, and forces fade with distance, so it is always a finite outcome. Matter in its various forms can be considered the fifth dimension of the reality formula. Yet within this last addition there is a further complication, and a very important one, as a deeper examination reveals. .

In one sense matter can be thought of as tangible substance having mass and some degree of solidity or relative impenetrability. Forces emanating from matter objects create interaction between tangible matter parts. The base modules of tangible matter we are familiar with is the atomic structure. The many types of atoms are considered the building blocks of the tangible reality of human experience. But atoms contain the same kind of parts, only a question of how many. The atom is a composite structure with very small parts rapidly interacting through forces generated between them to create a much larger structure. The interaction between shell elactrons and the nucleus creates a larger zone of virtual impenetrablility. At the heart of the atom, the parts of the nucleus are now also known to be composite with the detaction of so called 'quarks' . The search goes on for more particles and modern particle colliders are discovering many new parts by colliding matter elements. Some particles once separated from their interaction become untenable and quickly unwind and seemingly disappearing into the void. In fact it probably unwinds into its smaller parts which are no longer detectable. Other outcomes can be re-integration into another existing structure. With all this downscale part discoveries it would not be unreasonable to wonder just how deep downscale are the roots of our world of matter.

The host environment of space being an infinite emptiness offers no resistance to further deconstruction into smaller and smaller parts to any degree of minisculity, or even to infinity of smallness. While there may be nothing preventing an infinite deconstruction, it still remains to be found whether downscale matter can have finite roots instead of infinite deconstruction. There are a number different ideas that have attempted a solution, without much success, the most obvious one being an ultimate base particle or particles at the bottom of the hierarchy, sometimes referred to as a 'God particle' .  This would entail some kind of elementary structure that cannot be further divided. But then nothing whatsoever suggests that there is a finite end to deconstruction. In fact an ending fabricated can only lead to a further need of explanation, on and on, forever. It is what is referred to as a vicious regress. The idea of a foundation particle is only a fancy created by our thinking conditioned by experience to reject anything infinite. On the other hand continuance into smaller and smaller reduction with more and more dynamic interacting parts with no end to the process would requires no further explanation than what the observations already imply. Still the mind can be uneasy on this point as infinity is difficult to accept having been conditioned in experience only by finite factors. This confusion can however be overcome by recognising that infinity is not counter intuitive.

Other attempts at finite solutions have also failed to give results. These tend to offer some complex extra dimensions based on some mathematical idea, like space curving in on itself giving in a dimension we cannot imagine. Others look to multi dimensional strings or other configurations.Some of these sound very exciting and powerful in inspiring the human imagination into fantasy. Modern art and culture has been greatly influenced by them. But so have many other mystical and fantastical ideas or ghostly tales. As the facts stand at present none of these theories have yet succeed in solving the physics problem in its entirety.

Historically, in the absence of a viable solution the problem has been ignored and put aside, so long as there exist theories that work well enough on their respective scale levels as do Quantum and Relativity theories. But surely something must be missing. Abstract mathematically based attempts to explain physical phenomena can easily be misapplied and it is difficult to spot incorrect attribution to physical elements. The two main theories of Quantum and Relativity still cannot be completely reconciled and it remains a mystery how Relativity can explain the behaviour of larger scale phenomena but cannot operate well enough on the quantum level, and how quantum physics fails to explain the large scale world where Relativity is so useful. The search for a bridging idea to bring the two theories together has not yielded success for near a century, but not for a lack of trying.

PART 2

An infinite deconstruction to smaller and smaller interactive parts would mean there is no ultimate foundation to matter. Yet every structure type deconstructed into, has its roots in a further infinity of deconstructions. In this way matter is certainly not without foundations. A foundation in infinity. Just another infinite aspect of reality. But with the idea of an infinite deconstruction into smaller and smaller interactive elements, another very important question arises. The deconstruction downscale is one way of looking at it, but taken from the other direction from the small scale upward, the process of structure building eventually reaches the atoms and then it seem to terminate with our discerned world of matter. But why stop here? After an infinity of steps why terminate at that point? There is no valid explanation, there are no specific clues. Perhaps it doesn't terminate with our perceived matter. Is it possible to show a continuation of the process into the large scales of astronomy and the universe at large? In fact there are large scale structures commonly found like stars and their solar systems, and on a larger scale galaxies and their larger formations. This evidence may indicate a possible continuance, but how can the large scale structures be seen as part of the same system? How can the micro world of extremely rapid dynamics be compared to what happens on larger scales and beyond in a world with very slow interaction between parts and there seems no possibility to creating regions of exclusion as with the rapid interactive dynamics of atoms.

There is a way to compare them, but there are are crucial time factors to reconsider. These time factors have never yet been subject of discussion. This is a breakthrough in itself and it opens the way to a new understanding of time. The infinity of spatial extension allows for the existence of any larger size structure whatsoever to infinity. Adding that the time continues infinitely into the future the structures of the macro world of astronomy can with a modification of the time concept be seen to evolve as rapidly as atoms. It is not actually changing it but broadening of its range to include other ways of considering it.

As the mind thinks way upscale where the huge structures that exist at that scale level. All the interaction at this level would look very slow by our way of seeing it, almost at a standstill. The time factor needs further clarification. For us to perceive our world of matter a moment of discernment can be defined as a fraction of a second. The moments are tagged together to form a continuous stream. While we define a moment as a fraction of a second, on the large scale this could never be significant. When a moment is redefined to considerably longer intervals, like millions or trillions of years or more, and they are tagged together as rapidly as we do our moments, the huge megastructures of astronomy would be seen with a more rapid dynamics and could then be seen to be evolving not unlike our world of atoms. This way of seeing it can then lead to understanding of the possibility of other worlds of matter on very large scales. The long intervals turn into a rapid sequence of moments and the mega structures evolve rapidly in a causal evolution of events. It would result in a set of physical laws as observable at those levels, but it is all one physics appearing differently at different scale levels.
To understand this mega reality a little better in a thought experiment imagine levels of magnitude upscale at which huge interacting structure types that create another matter style environment, by our way of seeing it extremely slowly, but on the large scale in a matter style environment huge perceiving creatures could evolve. It could be thousands of levels upscale or much more or less. These creatures would be created by their relative micro matter base, which in our terms would still be huge.  With the redefined moments to sequences of very long periods of our time, they would perceive their mega world to be as rapid as we see ours. Their perception mechanisms and instruments would function based on the dynamics of the large scale micro matter that creates their world. With further matter construction to infinity of large scales many other even larger scale matter style environments could exist, perhaps an infinity of them.  In the downscale reduction it is the reverse argument to the upscale, with tiny structures evolving very rapidly and any perceiving creatures that may exist in these downscale materialities would be created by their micro matter base and their world by our view evolving extremely rapidly, but they would also perceive their environment not unlike we perceive ours. From our point of view the evolution of events would be far too rapid and in very miniscile scale to be discerned by us, perhaps ever.

The infinite transformations of the matter process produces infinite layers of different structure types, each spread throughout the entire universe, the same universe but at different scales and different dynamics. Atoms for instance could be said to be spread throughout the universe, as they are. On a larger scale levels it could be said that solar systems are spread throughout the universe, as they are, and then galaxies etc... and the same applies at each level downscale with an infinity of layers upscale and down. This strongly suggests that our matter base has an underlying layer of micro infrastructure.

So far the discussion has been about size differences, but there is the question of dynamics. There is an important dynamic process that drives the entire system. It is cyclicality, but not in the sense of orbital cyclicality only. For instance, a back and forth pulsation can be considered cyclical as can many other configurations. In galaxies with billons of stars there are some that disintegrate and others are created from their debris so there are roughly the same number always. On micro scales electrons cycle very rapidly about (not necessarily around) the nucleus. The cyclical movement is rapid enough to set up a sphere of relative solidity or impenetrability. In turn at the next level downscale the atomic nuclear parts are also composite, created by even smaller interacting parts and they in turn are also composite with cyclical paths considerably shorter at each step downscale. While the paths shorten the speeds at which these shorter paths are traversed are not significantly reduced creating higher cyclical frequencies at each step of reduction downscale. With upscale structuring into the world of astronomy the cyclical paths are considerably longer at each level upscale but the speed at which they can be traversed has a maximum value, so lower cyclical frequencies are inevitable with each upscale transformation. With an infinity of structure layers representing unique and different types of formations both upscale and downscale there can be no limit to variation. Every step upscale or down reveals different configuration types spread throughout the universe.

In summary, the interaction of structures both upscale and down is facilitated by various types of forces. But in fact forces emanate from matter itself and are functions of matter. The dynamics behind the system is is cyclicality. Downscale cyclical frequencies increase, upscale cyclical frequencies decrease. Toward the micro, at present we are looking at several levels deep. Beyond that the minute structure types involved are too small and frequencies too rapid to discern as matter having substance, appearing as energy only. But a zero mass solution is only relative. There is a mass, there is always mass however small. On larger scales at our level of matter discernment we can observe energy stored and transferred from matter to matter. On micro scales energy that may appear without an obvious matter host would have its matter base at micro levels below our discernment capabilities.. In the ultimate terms of the overall reality, our perceived world of substance happens to be positioned somewhere along an infinite chain of upward structuring ranging from infinitely small to the infinitely large. The Structure of Reality theory is unique as it presents a totally self contained universe, a complete and comprehensive and exhaustive model of reality which can be understood, with nothing required to be brought in from outside its own parameters. It explains what reality is and how it works. It is the foundation concept from which a detailed physics can be generated. It is also the ultimate human understanding of how we fit in and what we are to the overall reality at large.

Dear visitor, if after reading the above introduction to the theory hopefully you attained the new vision of reality.

 

Click here if you wish to support (subscribe to) the Theory. Any amount ok - you choose the amount. Thanks for all your support. Be assured all subscription details are to remain confidential.

Thank you for your time

Kind regards

Gary T Forbat

--------------------------------------------------------------

Added Notes 29 December 2014

Intelligent beings are the 'eyes and ears' of reality, as reality has no mind of its own with infinity of all its aspects. But it can generate perceiving intelligent individual minds who can comprehend its nature. Intelligent life in the universe is no doubt a very rare thing, but nevertheless there are bound to be an infinity of variations within that rarity. That is the nature of infinity. Every sequence is infinite however rarely they occur.

There is in the infinite spatial environment an infinity of interactive matter driven by causation in a deterministic manner, at least until such time as self aware intellect appears with an ability to make choices and influence deterministic causation outcomes. The intelligent self aware mind can then discover and comprehend reality. In our environmenmt everything material is made from different combinations of atoms. Our bodies and perception mechanisms are made from them. The way we perceive our world in time depends on the dynamics at which our atom based preceptive mechanisms work.


 

All contents ©Copyright 2012 Structure of Reality
All Rights Reserved Gary T Forbat &