rd table.
image
 
image
 

Welcome to the Stucture of Reality Website

Gary T Forbat 2014

The author of the works on this website is Gary T Forbat

 

Before proceeding to the main theory, please read the introduction to it here below:

 

A new introduction to the main Theory 7th March 2014

Here is my current and simplest introduction to The Structure of Reality theory:

Based on the evidence of measurements, calculations and on what we as humans experience, it looks as though the spatial universe extends indefinitely outward in all directions in four dimensions, three of space and one of time. Time gives the three dimensional structure the reality of continued existence. The spatial environment can be viewed as a pure infinite emptiness. Matter exists inside space and adds the fifth dimension. Forces emanate from matter itself and can be considered functions of matter. Space provides the room for matter to exist in and matter creates events. This is the very core of the reality formula.

In one sense matter can be thought of as tangible substance having mass and some degree of solidity or relative impenetrability. Forces emanating from matter objects create interaction between matter parts. The matter we are familiar is the atom. It forms the building blocks of the tangible reality we are familiar with. We can go another level downscale to the atom's nucleus which is now known to be a composite structure. There are already many new parts being discovered further downscale and it would not be unreasonable to wonder how far this particle deconstruction continues. As for the host environment of space, it is just emptiness with nothing to prevent further deconstruction into smaller parts to infinity, or to any degree of minisculity whatsoever.

The other option is a finite framework seeking an ultimate 'God particle' somewhere downscale. This would entail some kind of elementary particle or particles which cannot be subject to further deconstruction. It would require some undividable material, some kind of ultimate solidity. How can that be explained, and on what grounds can the process of deconstruction terminate? Then there are theories offering all kinds of extra dimensions. Indeed some of these are very exciting, powerful and modern concepts that can stir the imagination. Modern art and culture has been greatly influenced by them . But as the facts stand none of these have yet succeed in solving the physics problem in its entirety. Something must be missing.

Extra dimensional solutions leave serious confusion for the mind to comprehend. It is argued that it need not be conceptually understood as long as the mathematics can formulate it, however abstract it may be. But then, mathematics can define non real objects too so where is the line to be drawn as to what is real or not? Closer to the conceptual understanding, infinity too has its problems for the intuitive thinker, but this can be fixed by a simple mental input. It is natural that our reasoning feels confused with infinity outcomes, since in experience of life and the world of matter everything seems to be limited to beginnings and ends and infinity does not give that resolution. Nevertheless rational thinking can overcome this confusion by a logical input to extend the intuitive understanding, and there is nothing counter intuitive in recognising that a three dimensionally structured space extends infinitely outward without ever reaching end. It is the idea of an ending that presents the problems. Three dimensional Cartesian geometry perfectly fits the spatial environment and there is nothing counter intuitive about it. The logical outcome of this geometry is an inevitable infinite extension. But to understand the infinity of extension, no specific knowledge of each or any regions of the extension is needed. The mental plugin is complete. In this way infinity is easily understood and it should not be a surprise that all other aspects of reality are ultimately infinite, but this will be a subject on another occasion.

As in the previous example of extension, an infinite deconstruction of matter likewise requires no knowledge of every specific structure deconstructed into in an infinite chain of reduction. It is a process of deconstruction into the interaction of smaller and smaller parts with no endi, continuing downscale to infinity. That means there is no ultimate and finite foundation to matter. Yet every structure type deconstructed into, wherever in the infinite system downscale has at its roots in a further infinity of deconstructions. In this way matter is certainly not without foundation.

The downscale may be one aspect, but that is not all there is to it. While matter deconstructs infinitely downscale, our discernible world of matter is not positioned at the top of this hierachy. It continues on upscale into the world of astronomy, from solar systems to galaxies, their clusters and whatever else upscale in an infinity of transformations to larger and larger interactive structures. While it is a two way infinity both upscale and down, the causal chain leads from micro to macro, but not through the passage of time as causality is conventionally understood. It all happens simultaneously and it forms the fifth dimension of reality. Our world of discernible matter is located somewhere along this infinity of transformations.

The question to address now is how the micro world of extremely rapid dynamics can be compared to what happens on the large scales of astronomy and beyond. The structures of micro scales develop very rapidly have very tiny proportions while the large scales are so different with very slow interaction apparently creating no regions of exclusion as with atoms and their parts. To understand how these very large scale structures can make similar sense as micro phenomena there are crucial time factors to consider. These time factors have never yet been a subject of discussion. This is a breakthrough in itself and it opens the way to a new understanding of time.

With an infinity of spatial extension being an infinite emptiness, any larger size structure whatsoever to infinitely large can occur. Adding time continuing infinitely into the future the structures of the macro world of astronomy can then be seen to evolve rapidly with a modification of the time concept. It is not actually a modification but a broadening of its range. As the mind thinks way upscale where structures would be truly gigantic and interacting at an incredibly slow rate by our way of seeing it, the time factor can be adjusted as follows: For us to perceive our world of matter a moment of discernment can be defined as a fraction of a second. The moments are tagged together to form a continuous stream. While we define a moment as a fraction of a second, on the large scale this could never be significant. When a moment is redefined to considerably longer intervals, like millions or trillions of years or more, and they are tagged together as rapidly as we do our moments, the huge megastructures of astronomy would gain dynamics and could be seen to be evolving as rapidly as our world of atoms. This way of seeing it can then lead the way to understanding of the possibility of worlds of matter on very large scales. The long intervals turn into a rapid sequence of moments which can reveal a world of matter on very larger scales. It would have a causal evolution of events and a set of physical laws as observable at those levels. It is all one physics appearing differently at different scale levels.

To comprehend its reality in a thought experiment, imagine levels of magnitude upscale at which huge interacting structure types create another matter style environment with the evolution of material events and even life forms and intelligence. With the redefined moments to sequences of very long periods, the interaction can be considered to be as rapid and dynamic as our micro matter environment. From this a mega world of matter style events could be created.

The infinite transformations produce infinite layers of different structure types that spread throughout the universe. It would not be unreasonable to expect that other material style worlds exist both upscale and down, some with the possibility of life and even intelligence. On large scales for instance, in such a world based on mega matter as the micro environment of another matter style world, the huge intelligent beings that may evolve would perceive their world not entirely differently to how we see ours. Their perception mechanisms and instruments would function based on the dynamics of the large scale micro matter that creates it. In the downscale reduction it is the reverse argument to the upscale, with tiny structures evolving very rapidly and any perceiving creatures that may exist in these downscale materialities would be in a world evolving extremely rapidly, far too rapidly and in far too small in proportions for us to discern, perhaps ever.

The dynamics behind the upscale structuring process is cyclicality, as it is in the downscale. On micro scales electrons cycle very rapidly about the nucleus. Rapidly enough to set up a sphere of relative impenertability. In turn the atomic nucleus is composite created by even smaller parts interacting and they are also composite with cyclical paths considerably shorter at each step downscale, but the speed at which they are traversed are not reduced, creating higher frequencies at each reduction. With upscale the structuring to the world of astronomy the cycles have considerably longer paths with each step upscale and with 'c' as the maximum speed at which they can be traversed lower frequencies are inevitable with each upscale transformation. With an infinity of structure layers representing unique and different types of formations both upscale and downscale there can be no limit to variation. Every step upscale or down reveals different configurations. Among same types there are also differences. No two things can be perfectly alike. Even if appearing to be, somewhere downscale there will occur differences.

In summary the interaction of structures both upscale and down is facilitated by various types of forces. But in fact forces emanate from matter itself and are functions of matter. The dynamics behind the system is is cyclicality. Downscale frequencies increase, upscale frequencies decrease. Toward the micro, at present we are looking at several levels deep. Beyond that the minute structure types involved are too small and frequencies too rapid to discern as matter having substance, appearing as energy only. But the zero mass solution is only relative. There is a mass, there is always a mass however small. On larger scales at our level of matter discernment we can observe energy stored and transferred from matter to matter. On micro scales energy that may appear without an obvious matter host would have its matter base at micro levels below our discernment capabilities. At least for now. In the ultimate terms of the overall reality, our perceived world of substance happens to be positioned somewhere along an infinite chain of upward structuring ranging from infinitely small to the infinitely large. The Structure of Reality theory is unique as it presents a totally self contained universe, a complete and comprehensive model of reality which nearly everyone can understand, and with nothing required to be brought in from outside its own parameters. It explains what reailty is and how it works. What more could we want. It is the ultimate human understanding of how we fit in and what we are to the overall reality at large.

Sorry...out of time. Hope refine further as time permits

 

Dear visitor, if after reading the above, hopefully you obtained the new vision of reality. We are the 'eyes and ears' of reality. Now it can ferment and develop within your own mindset and bring to light and correct long misunderstood ideas and situations.

You can also support the development of the theory by subscribing to my quarterly newsletter. There is no set subscription amount, only a minimum amount of $5.00 would be preferred. Click the PayPal link below to subscribe

PayPal Secure Gateway

Thank you for your time, and come back soon to see updates and refinements to the theory.

Kind regards

Gary T Forbat

 

 


 

All contents ©Copyright 2012 Structure of Reality
All Rights Reserved Gary T Forbat &