Welcome to the Stucture of Reality Website
Witness here the future of thought ! It’s not a question of ‘if’, but a question of ‘when’ it will become the mainstream of thinking about the world we find ourselves in. But it may need a new generation of academics whose careers do not depend on maintaining the status quo.
What is this theory about ? It is not a theory of physics but rather a foundation theory for physics, a framework for the reality of space time and matter from which the physics can be generated.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE 'STRUCTURE OF REALITY' THEORY. (This version of the Introduction was first published on 7th March 2014. A number of improvements in its expression have been added since.)
Based on simple perceptive observation the universe appears to extend in all directions to an undefined distance. There are limits to our range of direct observation perceptive or instrumental to some billions of light years distance. Beyond that there can be logical projections. By logical extension the spatial region should extend further and further with no possibility of an ending. A Cartesian 3 dimensional geometry clearly defines this relationship, indicating that space must then extend to infinity in all directions. Time of course is a fourth dimension which is a necessary part of the formula, as it provides continued existence to the spatial region. With infinite extension there can be no absolute centre location, only relative centres with finite parameters may exist.
The spatial region can then be considered an infinitely extended emptiness which provides the room for matter and forces to exist within it. Apart from basic common attributes like three dimensionality, matter is certainly not a continuous single infinite entity like the emptiness of space, but is everywhere fragmented in finite portions. A causal evolution of matter exists by interaction through a range of forces. But then, interestingly forces always emanate from matter and therefore can be considered a function of matter itself. Considered on overall scales, matter is relatively evenly distributed through the universe, though on local scales this can vary. Beyond direct observational limits there is nothing to suggest that matter distribution may not be the same as in the observed regions.
In an infinite space with matter distribution on large scales relatively even there can be no gravitational collapse since at any location in space there is an equal amount of gravitational attraction coming from every direction, thereby keeping everything reasonably in place. While on local scales there can be differences, on overall scales the content of the spatial environment is static and space is 'flat' emptiness. Moreover space as an emptiness cannot curve. It is immutable and unreactive, then how can this emptiness with no other attributes curve? Curvature can however affect the invisible micro matter infrastructure which will be explained below.
There is a problem though, with current ideas projecting a 'Doppler' effect for the observed redshift of light with distance phenomena. This suggests an expanding universe with space being created between objects, supposedly starting some billions of years ago from a miniscule compression to an almighty explosion referred to as the 'big bang', with everything then racing away from each other. Emptiness expanding from nothing, or rather something coming from nothing? A logical impossibility. Ideas to overcome these problems have been proposed using extra dimensional mathematical ideas, but they do not explain how something is generated from nothing, nor do they solve the problem. It could be assumed that space is a product of matter and emptiness does not exist, and matter does not occupy space but is itself the spatial creator. But should not there be an existing room into which expansion occurs? Other problems also hinder these attempts. For instance how can time not have existed previously, just coming into being with the 'big bang'? How can all this huge amount of matter be compressed to a tiny volume, so tiny that it has virtually zero size, when much larger compressions of matter tend to burn off through nuclear reaction and/or explode? Not to mention all questions relating to such an event are incomprehensible brain twisters based on purely mathematical projections. The excuse given that the mind cannot comprehend them. In the absence of other explanations one might give it the benefit of the doubt, but what if the so called 'Doppler' effect could be shown to be the result of something else not related to spatial expansion or accelerated matter recession?
The lensing of light when passing close to a strong gravitational object is already well observed and it is associated with a redshift of its wavelength. We can currently measure major lensing effects, but then, light passes close to major gravitational objects relatively few times while the universe is full of gravitation coming from every which direction as light travels on its very long journey across space to get to us. With huge numbers of turning or weaving however slightly responding to minor gravitational forces as light travels in relatively empty regions, there is no reason to think it is not affected in the same way by redshift however slight.. Over long distances this is likely to accumulate until it becomes measurable. The effect could then be mistaken for 'Doppler' acceleration if the redshifts are percentile based. This can possibly be tested through measuring comparative lensing redshifts for percentile changes. But who is going to actually do this ? Not likely anyone will take the suggestion of a non-academic in light of the most prominent careers depending on the real Doppler effect and the big bang theory. Who would agree to rewrite all the books, debunk all those eminences, change the curriculums and in fact change nearly everything? Surely it is too hard to even contemplate. Nevertheless it must be proposed, if even for the future.
In this theory the structure of matter will be revealed, but time will also be shown in a new perspective. For instance, if the spatial environment is considered as an emptiness without its matter content, there can be no concept of time passage formed. It can only be thought of as an emptiness existing in a never ending present moment. This is actually the root concept of time previously never subject to discussion. When matter is added, the regular passing of time becomes possible by measuring the steady rhythms of material functions. Further aspects of time will come under scrutiny after the examination of matter.
What is matter and how is matter structured? The many variations of the atom and its chemistry of interaction creates the world of matter that we are part of and perceive. But the atomic structure is known to be a composite of much smaller parts in rapid interaction. The very rapid interaction of parts creates a much wider/larger structure. But the nucleus is also composite and its parts are now also known to be composite. The question arises as to where this reduction to a group of smaller interactive parts end? Or does it end at all? Is it like a fractal coastline zooming in to more and more details ad infinitum? The search goes on for more particles and modern colliders are discovering many new components. Some unwind into the seeming 'nothingness' disappearing into the void, actually too small to detect, or re-integrating into other existing structures.
Then how far can this reduction process continue? The spatial environment as an infinite emptiness can offer no resistance to further deconstruction into smaller and smaller parts to any degree of minisculity whatsoever even to infinity. A simple finite solution, of an ultimate particle downscale has no credence as many attempts have failed, most succumbing to a 'vicious regress' requiring new explanations at each step. The search for a finite answer has been long and complex and the utilisation of extra dimensions attempt to overcome the problems, but these have not yielded any conclusive results. Some of these extra dimensional theories sound very exciting and powerful in inspiring the human imagination into fantasy. Modern art and culture has been greatly influenced by them. But so have many other mystical and fantastical ideas or ghostly tales. As the facts stand at present none of these theories have yet succeed in solving the physics problem in its entirety, not even Quantum or Relativity theories which seem to rule their respective fields of competence, yet unable to reconcile into a single theoretical solution.
There is of course the remaining solution of an infinity of downscale steps into smaller and smaller and yet even smaller groups of interactive parts. Unfortunately the mind can be uneasy on this point as infinity is difficult to accept having been conditioned in our limited experience and observations to finite outcomes. The other difficulty is that infinity can never be proved by direct observation. Yet it does not in any sense mean it cannot be rationally understood. Infinity is not actually counter intuitive, it can be clearly understood, merely unable to quantify it. If matter keeps reducing infinitely to the interactive function of smaller and smaller parts in a never ending sequence of deconstruction, the roots of each part in this never-ending chain holds its own roots in an infinity of further reduction.
There is a lot more to it than just this. The deepest secrets of matter are yet to be revealed.
An infinite deconstruction to smaller and smaller interactive parts means there would be no ultimate finite foundation to matter, but then, every structure type deconstructed into has its roots in a further infinity of further deconstructions. In this way matter is certainly not without foundations, and very strong foundations indeed. But with the idea of an infinite deconstruction into smaller and smaller interactive elements, another very important question arises. The deconstruction downscale is one way of looking at it, but taken from the other direction, from the small scale upward, the process of structure building eventually reaches the atomic form, and does it then terminate with our discerned world of matter? It does not quite make sense. After an infinity of steps why terminate at this point? Or perhaps it doesn't. Is it possible that the process continues into the large scales of astronomy as well? In fact there are large scale structures commonly found like stars and their solar systems, their galaxies, their clusters and even larger formations. This may indicate a possible continuance, but how can the large scale structures be seen as part of the same system? How can the micro world of extremely rapid dynamics and space enclosure be compared to the larger scale objects of astronomy where cyclical interaction is extremely slow and therefore no possibility to creating the kind of regions of exclusion observed on small scales.
Yet there may be a way to compare them, however there are crucial time factors to reconsider. These time factors have never yet been subject of discussion. The infinity of spatial extension allows for the existence of any larger size structure whatsoever even to infinity. Adding the time factor as continuing into the infinite future, the huge structures of the macro world of astronomy can, with a simple modification of the time concept, be seen to function as rapidly as atomic structure. It is not actually changing the definition of time but broadening its range of understanding. A simple thought experiment may clarify the issue. As the mind thinks way upscale in the structuring process where the huge formations exist, the cyclical interaction at this level would look very slow by our way of seeing it, almost at a standstill. For us to perceive our world of matter a moment of discernment can be defined as a fraction of a second. The moments are tagged together to form a continuous stream. While we define a moment as a fraction of a second, on the large scale this could never be significant enough. When a moment is redefined to considerably longer intervals, like millions or trillions of years or more, and they are tagged together rapidly as we do our moments, these huge mega-structures of astronomy could be seen with a rapid dynamics comparable to our world of atoms. Any objects existing in this mega world built from these huge interacting formations could be seen by a perceiving being also built from them in much the same way we see our world. Of course it would look different but it is all one physics appearing differently at different scale levels.
With the redefined moments to rapid sequences of very long periods of our time, perceiving creatures in a mega world would perceive their materiality to be evolving not entirely differently from the way we see ours. Their perception mechanisms and other instruments they may utilise would be built from and function based on the dynamics of their mega based 'micro matter' that creates their world. With further matter construction to infinity of large scales many other even larger scale matter style environments could exist, perhaps an infinity of them. In the downscale reduction it is the reverse argument to the upscale, with tiny structures evolving very rapidly and any perceiving creatures that may exist in these downscale materialities would be created by their micro matter base and their world by our view would be evolving extremely rapidly, but they would also perceive their environment not unlike we perceive ours. From our point of view the evolution of events would be far too rapid and in very miniscule scale to be discerned by us, perhaps ever.
The infinite transformations of the matter process produces infinite layers of different structure types, each type spread throughout the entire universe, the same universe but at different scales and different dynamics. Atoms for instance could be said to be spread throughout the universe, as they are. On a larger scale levels it could be said that solar systems are spread throughout the universe, as they are, and then galaxies, then their larger formations and so on. The same applies at each level downscale with an infinity of layers upscale and downscale. This strongly suggests that our matter base has an underlying layer of micro infrastructure. A separate work is in the making to describe this invisible micro matter infrastructure through which all larger matter must pass.
So far the discussion has been about size differences, but there is the question of dynamics. There is an important dynamic process that drives the entire system. It is cyclicality, but not in the sense of orbital cyclicality only. For instance, a back and forth pulsation can be considered cyclical as can many other configurations. In galaxies with billons of stars there are some that disintegrate and others are created from their debris so there are roughly the same number maintained. On micro scales electrons cycle very rapidly about (not necessarily around) the nucleus. The cyclical movement is rapid enough to set up a sphere of relative solidity or impenetrability. Electrons themselves are now subject of investigation as to their internal structure.The main atomic nuclear parts, the protons are also known to be composite, created by even smaller rapidly interacting parts. They in turn are also bound to be composite with cyclical paths considerably shorter at each step downscale. While the paths shorten the speeds at which these shorter paths are traversed are not significantly reduced thereby creating higher cyclical frequencies at each step of reduction downscale. With upscale structuring into the world of astronomy the cyclical paths are considerably longer at each level upscale but the speed at which they can be traversed has a maximum value, so lower cyclical frequencies are inevitable with each upscale transformation. With an infinity of structure layers representing unique and different types of formations both upscale and downscale, there can be no limit to variation. Every step upscale or down reveals different configuration types that are spread throughout the universe.
In summary, the interaction of structures both upscale and down is facilitated by various types of forces. But in fact forces emanate from matter itself and are therefore functions of matter. The dynamics behind the system is cyclicality. Downscale cyclical frequencies increase, upscale cyclical frequencies decrease. Toward the micro, at present we are looking at several levels deep. Beyond that the minute structure types involved are too small and frequencies too rapid to presently discern as matter having substance, appearing as energy only. But a zero mass solution can only be relative. There is a mass, there is always a mass however small it may be. On larger scales at our level of matter discernment we can observe energy stored and transferred from matter to matter. On micro scales energy that may appear without an obvious matter host would have its matter base at micro levels below our present discernment capabilities. In ultimate terms of the overall reality, our perceived world of substance happens to be positioned somewhere along an infinite chain of upward structuring ranging from infinitely small to the infinitely large. The Structure of Reality theory is unique as it presents a totally self-contained universe, a complete and comprehensive and exhaustive model of reality which can be understood, with nothing required to be brought in from outside its own parameters. It explains what reality is and how it works. It is the foundation concept from which a detailed physics can be generated. It is also the ultimate human understanding of how we fit in and what we are to the overall reality at large.
Above I have presented a viable solution to the understanding of reality. Historically, in the absence of a solution the problem of reality has been ignored and put aside, so long as there exist theories that work well enough on their respective scale levels as do Quantum and Relativity theories. But surely something must be missing. Abstract mathematically based attempts to explain physical phenomena can easily be misapplied and it is difficult to spot incorrect attribution to physical elements. The two main theories of Quantum and Relativity still cannot be completely reconciled and it remains a mystery how Relativity can explain the behaviour of larger scale phenomena but cannot operate well enough on the quantum level, and how Quantum physics fails to explain the large scale world where Relativity is so useful. The search for a bridging idea to bring the two theories together has not yielded success for near a century, but not for a lack of trying. Here is a theory that is fully comprehensive and self-contained with nothing imported from the outside to validate it. I believe this is the turning point for future thought about reality. How long it will take for it to be fully recognised I cannot guess. I can only keep refining and perfecting its expression for future generations and bring a new vision to the relatively few who recognise its value today.
Thank you for your time. If it makes sense and you have gained the vision, kindly refer just two friends to it and see how it multiplies.
The core of my theory is published here but much of my work of the extended version is mostly incomplete and not yet published on this website. I hope to continue toward the full and complete theory of the theory as time permits. I also have thoughts on a number of other topics suc as philosophy, history, psychology, sociology and many other subjects which I intend to eventually publish on this or on another website.
Gary T Forbat
EXTRA NOTES ADDED
What is this theory about? - 20 December 2016
This is not a theory of physics. It is a framework for reality from which physics can be generated.
Newton and Einstein - 20 December 2016
Newton wasn't entirely wrong and Einstein wasn't entirely right.
Space warping -13 December 2016
If space is a pure emptiness, there can be no spatial warping as emptiness cannot be mutated in any way. But it does not mean that the invisible micro infrastructure through which all objects must traverse cannot warp. As explained previously, space is never actually empty with the entire infinite spatial region full of residual downscale matter layers. These are responsible for the observed universal background radiation and the so called 'dark matter'.
The meaning of emptiness of space - 24 September 2016
By simple observation it is obvious that matter occupies a very small amount of the space of the entire spatial environment, but what seems like emty space is not actually empty. It contains those structure types that are already terminated not making it through upscale to be a significant member of a higher level of structure. Considering time adjustment differences, it makes sense that many structure types terminate and only a lesser percentage make it to higher levels. The terminated unseen residual mix is responsible for the universal background radiation. With scale and time factors taken into account it makes sense that only a small percentage of structuring layers (structure types) make it upscale to the next level of materiality.
What is the meaning of c-sq in E=Mc2 - 24 September 2016
This may be just a bit of wild speciulation, an idea at a much too early stage to make definite conclusions. But it brings up an interesting question as to how else mass could be defined and what the 'c' squared stands for. In the equation E=Mcsq why is c squared? In terms if the Structure of Reality theory mass could be seen as consisting of the regions occupied by composing particles multiplied by the regions/areas swept out over a defined interval of time. The mass of an atom, for instance, includes the regions occupied by its components like the electrons and protons and the areas swept out by them over the defined interval. The areas swept out are traversed near 'c' and that may account for 'c'. The second level parts, those composing the protons, electrons etc.. are also sweeping out regios a 'c' and his adds the second level integrating of the two levels to 'c' squared. The residual of other levels below those scales are so insignificant for the purpose as not to be relevant.
Notes on my methodology - 18 September 2016
It is obvious I don't approach the subject through mathematics. The method I use I like to call conceptual representation. These concepts can represent very complex situations, all comprehensible and logically feasible. They can contain large numbers of underlying logical assumptions which can all be tested.
But the theory does not begin with a concept. The initial idea is built entirely on observational factual foundations. We have access to observe the spatial environment and there are facts already derived. Nevertheless there are limits to our observational range, whether observing the macro world of astronomical space or the micro world of atomic and sub atomic particles. With space, powerful telescopes can observe so many billions of light years away, but again there is a limit to the range we can access. Nothing suggest that beyond our observational range there is anything different than in the already observed region. The concept of infinitely extended space can be imagined and its infinity understood.
What is the connection between gravitation and acceleration / deceleration? - 01 September 2016
I will need to go over this again to validate the main points further, but at this early stage I can see a connection between gravitation as we find on large objects like planets or stars. As the Theory goes with the structuring process, we are part of a whole range of larger structures as the system is built upscale. This is clearly described in the Introduction to the Structure of Reality, above. Given this structuring process, every large structure we call a strong gravitational object such as our Earth or the Sun, is a smaller part of larger structures in the infinite upscale process. At each upscale step however there is a cyclical movement involved which is likely to reveal a different direction of travel than recorded locally. Both upscale and downscale different directions of cyclical travel are likely be found and at speeds that can reach near or at the maximum velocity such as the speed of light. In other words, in the overall sense every matter object is moving near or at 'c' in every possible direction at the same time. This creates a whole range of accelerations and decelerations thereby creating the 'G' forces we can measure and experience. .....sorry, out of time....to be continued soon
The invisible micro infrastructure - 01 September 2016
There is a simple answer to the universal background radiationand dark matter. Einstein’s cosmological constant may have had some meaning after all. If the universe is static and infinite in extent and matter is spread everywhere throughout it on every scale level of the structuring process, there is bound to be a residual matter underlay on micro scales. Not all structure types continue to build upscale. Roughly less than 10% go through to the next level. The other 90% of structure types terminate and become part of the invisible spatial environment. Nevertheless on much larger scales they could form spatial parts of a very much larger structure.
The basic building blocks of our matter environment is made of atoms. Atoms themselves are composite structures made from very much smaller rapidly interacting parts. Further down the scales, below the quarks are the infinite layers of micro residues. Fter a few steps downscale the matter layer parts are so small as to register only an energy reading. The universal background radiation represents this residue. It also explains dark matter. But the scale levels just below the atoms, their parts and the quarks have greatest of influence over our immediate space-matter environment. This seems to be an interactive underlay, the micro infrastructure. This itself is a huge subject to be discussed elsewhere.
Lensing and the Doppler like effect- 01 September 2016
There are no regions in the infinite universe where there are no gravitational forces at play at all. In every corner of space some gravitation is active however slight it may be. As light passes through long distances it is affected by many and varied gravitational forces. It is continually tugged in one direction or another and there is a redshift with each change of direction, however large or small. When what we know as an actual lensing phenomena occurs, there is a very strong gravitational interaction and a significant measurable redshift. The minor changes that occur far from close encounter with a strong gravitational objects are so slight they are not each measurable by current standards. The slight gravitational nudges however add up over longer distances and become significant with a pattern emerging resembling a Doppler effect . But it is an equivalence, not an equality.(see added note on 18 September 2016 above).
The Doppler like effect is achieved by percentile redshifts with each directional change. Very close encounters with strong gravitational objects are relatively rare but over long distances a very large number of varied lesser strength gravitation is encountered each causing a degree of redshift however slight. Over very long distances this becomes significant and a 'Doppler' like effect is observed. Unfortunately this has been erroneously equated to a Doppler effect leading to the space expansion theories currently in use. As explained above the universe is static, infinite in extent, with an infinite amount of matter existing in eternal never ending time.